 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
EFT PENDING FOR RESOLUTION BY THE COURT AFTER BRIEFING AND ARGUMENT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT ALASKA RESIDENCE ENDNOTE ASSAULT PARENTS ALLEGED VICTIM NAGARUK FLOYD NAGARUK BAIL CRIMES REASONABLENESS PROTECTION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALASKA CONSTITUTION SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT MOTION HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS APPEARANCE PARENTAL SUPERVISION COMMUNITY EVIDENTIARY HEARING VIOLATIONS CONSUMPTION EXCESSIVE BAIL PROTECTING IMPOSITION AMENDMENT PROBATION |
In the District Court for the State of Alaska Second Judicial District at Nome State of Alaska, Plaintiff vs. Floyd S. Nagaruk, DOB: 9/21/79, Defendant. Case No. 2NO-S98-545 Criminal Memorandum Order on Motion Floyd Nagaruk is charged with assault in the fourth degree on G.M.N. Nagaruk has moved to modify or trial release, wherein the court ordered him to "not return to the residence of G.N. (see endnote t made an offer of proof, unopposed by the state, for purposes of this motion. The following facts the complaint, and the offer of proof. At the time of the alleged assault defendant was an 18-year-old who lived with his family in his s alleged to have resulted from an incident in which defendant, intoxicated, shoved For that incident, defendant is charged with harassment in case 2NO-S98-546 CR.. Thereafter d Floyd about his misconduct and was hit on the left ear for his trouble; Floyd is charged herein G.M.N., the alleged victim, also resided and continues to reside in the family home. Defendant him to return home. In their opinion he presents no risk of harm to anyone in the household or ion, as parents they can provide better supervision to prevent consumption of alcohol than can sides in their home. His brother does not fear further harm and also desires defendant's return to violations of court-imposed conditions since release on August 28th. The alleged offense is a "crime involving domestic violence," as defined in AS 18.66.990: assaultSNIPPETS: |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
