 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNINSURED MOTORISTS VOORHEES POLICY ALASKA COVERAGE COURT INSURANCE ARBITRATION STATUTES VEHICLE SUMMARY JUDGMENT LANGUAGE UNKNOWN VEHICLE DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION STATUTORY TRUCK FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LEGISLATURE WINDSHIELD UNINSURED MOTORIST CLAIM SUPERIOR COURT MOTOR VEHICLE STATE FARM ARGUES UNDERINSURED MOTORIST INSURANCE INTERPRETATION NEGLIGENCE PLAINTIFF CATHERINE COUNTERCLAIM FOREGOING JURISDICTION |
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. CATHERINE T. VOORHEES, Defendant. Case No. 4FA-98-940 Civil MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, requests summary judgment in this ant, Catherine T. Voorhees, asks for summary judgment on her counterclaim foregoing jurisdiction The Alaska legislature has chosen to give the Superior Court jurisdiction in declaratory judgment a policy of this state just as does the judicial policy of encouraging arbitration. The court must The fundamental issue in this action requires the court to determine the meaning of the Voorhees's uirements. The court concludes that the policy language is not broader than the statute. The court ning of that language. I. FACTS While Voorhees was operating her car on May 30, 1997, an object struck and cracked her windshield. thrown up from the roadway by a semi-trailer passing in the opposite direction or a bullet coming ld have been a metal part from the passing truck. Voorhees claims that the impact and sudden noise l. Exh. A. She has sought medical payment benefits under Coverage C and uninsured motorist benefitsSNIPPETS: |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
