LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

NOBLETT v STATE OF ALASKA, DEPT. OF HEALTH Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: SU, CourtName: Superior Court, District: Third, JudgeName: Milton Souter, Plaintiff: NOBLETT, State: AK Alaska, UniqueCaseRef: AK>SU>71, Alaska, Immunity, Noblett, Employees, Social Services, Motion, Summary Judgment, Individual Employees, Superior Court, Anchorage, Duty, Myers, Responsibilities, Criminal Prosecutor, Pursuit, Child Abuse, Earth Movers, Neakok, Justices, Statutory, Policy, Enforcing, Child Abuse Reports, Faith, Causal Connection, Milton, Souter, Superior Court Judge , ContentID: 120239529

Case Documents
1 1995-12-22 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ¾Xÿ¾X
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100032
2 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 2 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ¾Xÿ¾XÿÄ$

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
IMMUNITY
COURT
NOBLETT
EMPLOYEES
SOCIAL SERVICES
MOTION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES
SUPERIOR COURT
ANCHORAGE
DEFENDANTS
DUTY
MYERS
RESPONSIBILITIES
CRIMINAL PROSECUTOR
PURSUIT
CHILD ABUSE
EARTH MOVERS
NEAKOK
JUSTICES
STATUTORY
POLICY
ENFORCING
CHILD ABUSE REPORTS
FAITH
CAUSAL CONNECTION
MILTON
SOUTER
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE

In the Superior Court for the State of Alaska

Third Judicial District at Anchorage

Daniel Noblett, Christina Noblett, and P.N.,
and through his defactor guardian/grandmother Jane E. Noblett, Plaintiff

v.

State of Alaska , Dept. of Health & Social Services, et al., Defendants

v.

Bethena Noblett, Bobby Droege and Curtis Cumiford, Third-Party Defendants.

Case No. 3An-93-1986 CI

Order

This matter came before the court on defendant's motion for Summary Judgment based on the issues of

Individual Immunity

This court finds Myers v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services, 812 F.2d. 1154 (9th
in Myers, the individual employees' responsibilities in this case are not very different from the
ndependent employees which the public interest requires in order for them to feel free to do what
 of child abuse investigations the individual employees' need for absolute personal immunity from
or criminal prosecutors.

State Immunity

SNIPPETS:
  • In the Superior Court for the State of Alaska
  • Daniel Noblett, Christina Noblett, and P.N., and through his defactor guardian/grandmother
  • Bethena Noblett, Bobby Droege and Curtis Cumiford, Third-Party Defendants.
  • This matter came before the court on defendant's motion for Summary Judgment based on the
  • This court finds Myers v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services,
  • Similar to the social workers in Myers, the individual employees' responsibilities in this
  • To be the independent employees which the public interest requires in order for them to feel
  • This court finds the reasoning of the majority of the justices in Earth Movers and of the
  • The state employees in this case were enforcing a basic statutorily declared policy to
  • Their good faith decisions in pursuit of that statutory policy were highly discretionary.
  • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment based on "No Causal
  • Dated at Anchorage, Alaska, this 22nd day of December, 1995.
  • Milton M. Souter
  • Superior Court Judge.
  •    |