![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ¾Xÿ¾XÿÄ$
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
IMMUNITY COURT NOBLETT EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SERVICES MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES SUPERIOR COURT ANCHORAGE DEFENDANTS DUTY MYERS RESPONSIBILITIES CRIMINAL PROSECUTOR PURSUIT CHILD ABUSE EARTH MOVERS NEAKOK JUSTICES STATUTORY POLICY ENFORCING CHILD ABUSE REPORTS FAITH CAUSAL CONNECTION MILTON SOUTER SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE |
In the Superior Court for the State of Alaska Third Judicial District at Anchorage Daniel Noblett, Christina Noblett, and P.N., and through his defactor guardian/grandmother Jane E. Noblett, Plaintiff v. State of Alaska , Dept. of Health & Social Services, et al., Defendants v. Bethena Noblett, Bobby Droege and Curtis Cumiford, Third-Party Defendants. Case No. 3An-93-1986 CI Order This matter came before the court on defendant's motion for Summary Judgment based on the issues of Individual Immunity This court finds Myers v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services, 812 F.2d. 1154 (9th in Myers, the individual employees' responsibilities in this case are not very different from the ndependent employees which the public interest requires in order for them to feel free to do what of child abuse investigations the individual employees' need for absolute personal immunity from or criminal prosecutors. State ImmunitySNIPPETS: |
| | | |