 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ¾Hÿ¾%HÿÄ$
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ALASKA ENGLISH PLAINTIFFS GOVERNMENT ENDNOTE ACT CONSTITUTION COMMUNICATE FOOTNOTE CITY PROFICIENT PROTECT SPEECH LAW EMPLOYEES SPEAK NATIVES EXCEPTION SET TOGIAK COURT COUNCIL REQUIRING GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS INUPIAQ PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MAYOR OFFICERS ADDRESSING JUSTIFICATION |
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT MOSES KRITZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. STATE OF ALASKA, and TONY KNOWLES, Governor, State of Alaska, Defendant. Case No. 3DI-99-12 CI HENRY ALAKAYAK, et al, Plaintiffs vs. STATE OF ALASKA, Defendant. Case No. 3AN-99-4488 CI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SUPPORTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION In last fall s general election, Alaska voters approved a ballot measure that made English the , required its use by State employees engaged in official business (see endnote #1). Plaintiffs in injunction to prevent implementation of the Act pending the outcome of litigation on the merits. hips favors plaintiffs, the court grants this relief. FINDINGS OF FACTSNIPPETS: |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
