 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
NOTE: THIS CASE IS IN TWO PARTS. THIS IS PART ONE. PLEASE ALSO REFER TO PART TWO. Iäÿ¾Hÿ¾%HÿÄ$
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
STUDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT MILLHOUSE ENDNOTE ALASKA COURT EXPULSION ADMINISTRATORS PARENTS APPELLANT WITNESSES BLAKE MILLHOUSE ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT VIDEOTAPE ARGUES EDUCATION CROSS-EXAMINATION PAINTBALL SEXUAL RELATIONS SCHOOL DISCIPLINE SEXUAL HARASSMENT AUTHORITIES IMMEDIATE EFFECT CONSTITUTIONAL COMMANDS SUPERIOR COURT THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ALLEGATIONS HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS ACTIVITIES |
Note: This case is in two parts. This is part one. Please also refer to part two. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT DENNIS AND CONNIE MILLHOUSE, as parents and natural guardians of their minor child Blake Millhouse, Appellants, vs. THE ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANCHORAGE SCHOOL BOARD, Appellees. No. 3AN-99-3462 Civil DECISION ON APPEAL I. INTRODUCTION Blake Millhouse, a 16 year old student, had sexual relations with a 14 year old girl, while another students. These events did not occur at school. The girl told school officials that she was this. The only witness at his expulsion hearing was an administrator. Millhouse argues that he was uld subject him to expulsion, that he was denied his right to cross examine witnesses and that his s appeal, and he also challenges the procedure before that body. II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGSSNIPPETS: |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
