LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

JADA QUINN and NINA STORM v STATE OF ALASKA, DOPS, DMV Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: 3AN-95-8805 CIVIL, CourtCode: SU, CourtName: Superior Court, Defendant: , District: Third, JudgeName: Rene Gonzalez, Plaintiff: JADA QUINN and NINA STORM, State: AK Alaska, UniqueCaseRef: AK>SU>3AN-95-8805CIVIL, License, Revocation, Alaska, Alcohol, Administration, Motorized Vehicle, Constitution, Quinn, Storm, Age, Control, Officer, Driver, Consumed Alcohol, Operating, Equal Protection, Administrative Proceeding, Motor Vehicle, Appellants, Peace Officer, Alcoholic Beverage, Licensed Activity, Possession, Government, Federal Equal Protection, Superior Court, Third Judicial District, Jada Quinn, Nina Storm , ContentID: 120239516

Case Documents
1 1997-02-13 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100018
10 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 10 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
REVOCATION
ALASKA
ALCOHOL
ADMINISTRATION
MOTORIZED VEHICLE
CONSTITUTION
QUINN
STORM
AGE
CONTROL
OFFICER
DRIVER
CONSUMED ALCOHOL
OPERATING
EQUAL PROTECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
MOTOR VEHICLE
APPELLANTS
PEACE OFFICER
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
LICENSED ACTIVITY
POSSESSION
GOVERNMENT
FEDERAL EQUAL PROTECTION
SUPERIOR COURT
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
JADA QUINN
NINA STORM

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

JADA QUINN and NINA STORM, Appellants,

v.

STATE OF ALASKA, DOPS, DMV, Appellee.

Case No. 3AN-95-8805 Civil

OPINION

This appeal involves the constitutionality of AS 28.15.183, which provides for administrative
cer has probable cause to believe that a person is at least 14 years of age but not yet 21 years of
 of AS 04.16.050. Under AS 04.16.050, it is unlawful for a person under the age of 21 years to
verage.

The provision of AS 28.15.183 at issue in this appeal does not require that a minor be operating or
 nor does it require the minor to be impaired in any way when said minor is in possession of or
that a peace officer had probable cause to believe that a minor possessed or consumed alcohol, a
icense is imposed for the first incident, one year revocation is imposed for the second incident,
 incident. AS 28.15.183 (d).

FACTS

On July 22, 1995, at approximately 11:30 p.m., Anchorage Police Officer Brown, who was wearing
police uniform, approached five persons who were around a campfire on a beach near Point Woronzof
ned beer containers and some unopened beers in a 12-pack within the control of the five
entified themselves as police officers and inquired as to the age of each of the five young women.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
  • THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
  • JADA QUINN and NINA STORM, Appellants,
  • This appeal involves the constitutionality of AS 28.15.183, which provides for administrative
  • Under AS 04.16.050, it is unlawful for a person under the age of 21 years to possess,
  • The provision of AS 28.15.183 at issue in this appeal does not require that a minor be
  • If an administrative officer finds that a peace officer had probable cause to believe that a
  • Jada Quinn and Nina Storm each disclosed that they were 20 years of age.
  • Quinn was charged with "unlawfully consuma quantity of alcoholic beverage while less than 21
  • The central question presented in this appeal is whether it is constitutional for the state
  • In Baker, the Supreme Court held, however, that a person is not entitled to a jury trial in
  • The constitutional issue in Zerkel was whether the federal double jeopardy clause of the
  • We hold that, when the government employs a licensing scheme to regulate a profession or an
  • Thus, in the particular context of a licensed activity, enforcement efforts by the state will
  • Legislation affecting an individual s license to drive is not subject to the heightened
  • Under federal equal protection analysis, where there is no fundamental right at stake, and
  •    |