LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ANIEVAS v NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: , CourtCode: SU, CourtName: Superior Court, Defendant: , District: Second, JudgeName: Ben Esch, Plaintiff: ANIEVAS, State: AK Alaska, UniqueCaseRef: AK>SU>45, Borough, Alaska, Discharge, Anievas, Argues, Judgement, Progressive Discipline, Matter, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Party, Faith, Covenant, Ordinance, Violation, Administrative Remedies, Conviction, Fair Dealing, Infraction, North Slope Borough, Memorandum, Employment, Reasonableness, Constitution, Superior Court, Regardless, Borough Finally Argues, Personnel , ContentID: 120239501

Case Documents
1 1998-04-03 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100002
11 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 11 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
BOROUGH
ALASKA
DISCHARGE
COURT
ANIEVAS
ARGUES
JUDGEMENT
PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE
DEFENDANT
MATTER
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
PARTY
FAITH
COVENANT
ORDINANCE
VIOLATION
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
CONVICTION
FAIR DEALING
INFRACTION
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH
MEMORANDUM
EMPLOYMENT
REASONABLENESS
CONSTITUTION
SUPERIOR COURT
REGARDLESS
BOROUGH FINALLY ARGUES
PERSONNEL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT BARROW

NELSON ANIEVAS, Plaintiff,

vs.

NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, a municipality, Defendant

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

In this matter, each party has moved for summary judgement on certain issues. The defendant Borough
e plaintiff progressive discipline, and regardless, the discharge was supported by just cause. The
nt on plaintiff s claims for fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of the covenant of good faith and
stantive and procedural due process, in violation of 43 U.S.C. 1983, are not cognizable. It further
ause he failed to fully exhaust the administrative remedies available to him. The Borough finally
ecause Anievas failed to avoid or reduce his losses or that for a period of time, he was without a
ion.

The plaintiff opposes these motions, and argues that he is entitled to entry of judgement on

FACTS:

On June 27, 1994, Nelson Anievas was convicted of disorderly conduct for striking Nicagio David at
ote #1]. At the time of the incident Anievas was employed as a residential aide at the North Slope
e Borough's Department of Health and Social Services (NSBDHSS), but was not on duty or performing
he plaintiff approximately two and one half months after the altercation.

On July 19, 1994, DHSS Director Irene McIntosh issued a Notice of Intent to Discharge to Anievas.
 residential aide required that he "model appropriate problem-solving behavior" and interact with
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
  • The defendant Borough seeks a ruling that it was not obligated to provide plaintiff
  • The defendant also argues that it is entitled to judgment on plaintiff s claims for
  • It further asserts that the plaintiff s claims are barred because he failed to fully exhaust
  • The Borough finally argues that any recovery must be reduced or denied because Anievas failed
  • At the time of the incident Anievas was employed as a residential aide at the North Slope
  • She questioned, in light of his conviction, whether he could "effectively perform these
  • An additional reason relied upon to support his discharge was a condition of probation
  • Director McIntosh concluded that maintaining a counseling relationship with the Plaintiff
  • The following day, Anievas delivered a hand written request addressed to Leona Okakok, the
  • No appeal or further proceedings were provided by the Borough, and suit was timely filed in
  • In reviewing a motion for summary judgment, this court must determine whether any genuine
  • The plaintiff argues that the provisions of the ordinance defining "cause" cannot apply to
  • He also argues that a conviction for disorderly conduct cannot be ground for discharge under
  • The Borough states in its Reply Memorandum that the plaintiff s conviction for disorderly
  • The United States Supreme Court has held that the Ex Post Facto clause of the U.S.
  • 1694 the Alaska Supreme Court applied an ex post facto analysis to a statute which changed
  • The conclusion would be the same, if the fairness and reasonableness analysis were used.
  • Breach of the Contractual Obligation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.
  • The defendant also has moved for summary judgment on plaintiff s claims that it breached the
  •    |